Home The News

The News
Business Insider: Quant Says Quant Funds Will Be Fine Because Quants Are Smarter Than Other People PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 27 August 2010 14:03

CNBC found data that says investors have pulled 61% of the money they had invested in quant funds since 2007 and 1/4 of all quant funds have closed since that year.

They had a segment yesterday with two quants to dissect the data. The conclusion: the industry should be fine. It can ride on its reputation for being smarter than everyone else!

The video kicks off with quant manager of Able Alpha Trading, Irene Aldridge, who brushed the data off – saying the results might really be because people are confused.

Click here to read more

 
Quant Funds Falling Out of Favor? Not So Fast! PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 27 August 2010 14:00

Irene Aldridge discussed the recent developments in quant hedge fund universe on CNBC.  Click the link below to view the segment.

 

 
Small Investors and the Implications of the Financial Reform Bill PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 28 July 2010 15:52

About the time of the "flash crash" of May 6, 2010, many small investors appear to have left the U.S. stock markets, according to a recent Wall Street Journal article. The Financial Reform Bill, passed and celebrated with much fanfare last week, is sometimes thought to help bring those investors and their cash back into the equity markets. This articles takes a close look at the likely causes underlying the investor exodus, the Bill and its probable effect on investor behavior.

Click here to read the article in full on HuffingtonPost.com

 
How Profitable Are High-Frequency Trading Strategies? by Irene Aldridge PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 26 July 2010 19:30

 

High frequency trading has been taking Wall Street by storm. While no institution thoroughly tracks performance of high-frequency funds as of the date this article is written, colloquial evidence suggests that the majority of high-frequency managers delivered positive returns in 2008, while 70% of low-frequency practitioners lost money, according to the New York Times.

The discourse on what is the profitability of high-frequency trading strategies always runs into the question of availability of performance data on returns realized at different frequencies. Hard data on performance of high-frequency strategies is indeed hard to find. Hedge funds successfully running high-frequency strategies tend to shun the public limelight. Others produce data from questionable sources.

Yet, performance at different frequencies can compared using publicly available data by estimating the maximum potential profitability. Profitability of trading strategies is often measured by Sharpe ratios, a risk-adjusted return metric first proposed by a Nobel Prize winner, William Sharpe. A Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk; a Sharpe ratio of 2 means that the average annualized return on the strategy twice exceeds the annualized standard deviation of strategy returns: if the annualized return of a strategy is 12%, the standard deviation of returns is 6%. The Sharpe ratio further implies the distribution of returns: statistically, in 95% of cases, the annual returns are likely stay within 2 standard deviations from the average. In other words, in any given year, the strategy of Sharpe ratio of 2 and annualized return of 12% is expected to generate returns from 0% to 24% with 95% statistical confidence, or 95% of time.

The maximum possible Sharpe ratio for a given trading frequency is computed as a sample period’s average range (High – Low) divided by the sample period’s standard deviation of the range, adjusted by square root of the number of observations in a year. Note that high-frequency strategies normally do not carry overnight positions, and, therefore, do not incur the overnight carry cost often proxied by the risk-free rate in Sharpe ratios of longer-term investments.

Table 1 compares the maximum Sharpe Ratios that could be attained at 10-second, 1-minute, 10-minute, 1-hour and 1-day frequencies in EUR/USD. The results are computed ex-post with perfect 20/20 hindsight on the data for 30 trading days from March 11, 2009 through March 22, 2009. The return is calculated as the maximum return attainable during the observation period within each interval at different frequencies. Thus, the average 10-second return is calculated as the average of ranges (high-low) of EUR/USD prices in all 10-second intervals from March 11, 2009, through March 22, 2009. The standard deviation is then calculated as the standard deviation of all price ranges at a given frequency within the sample.

 

Table 1.  Maximum Profitability of High-frequency Strategies at Various Trading Frequencies

Trading Frequency Average Maximum Gain (Range) per Period Range Standard Deviation per Period Number of observations in the sample period Maximum Annualized Sharpe Ratio
10 seconds 0.04% 0.01% 2,592,000 5879.8
1 minute 0.06% 0.02% 43,200 1860.1
10 minutes 0.12% 0.09% 4,320 246.4
1 hour 0.30% 0.19% 720 122.13
1 day 1.79% 0.76% 30 37.3

As Table 1 shows, the maximum profitability of trading strategies measured using Sharpe ratios increases with increases in trading frequencies. From March 11, 2009, through March 22, 2009, the maximum possible annualized Sharpe ratio for EUR/USD trading strategies with daily position rebalancing was 37.3, while EUR/USD trading strategies that held positions for 10 seconds could potentially score Sharpe ratios well over 5,000 (five thousand) mark.

In practice, well-designed and implemented strategies trading at the highest frequencies tend to produce double-digit Sharpe ratios. Real-life Sharpe ratios for well-executed daily strategies tend to fall in the 1-2 range.

 

 

Last Updated on Monday, 26 July 2010 22:22
 
Huffington Post: What Is High-Frequency Trading, Afterall? PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 12 July 2010 18:10

Click here to read the article in full on HuffingtonPost.com

 
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Page 1 of 16